The
Illegal Immigration and Ethnic Conflicts of NE India
Contents:
1. Introduction
2. Strategic
Importance
3. Various
Accords
4. Sixth
Schedule and Local Autonomy
5. Historical
Background of Immigration
6. After
Partition of India
7. Immigration
Before and After 1971
8. Laws
and Agreements to tackle Immigration and citizenship in India
9. Provisions
of IMDT Act 1983
10. Assam
Accord, 1985
11. Supreme
court Verdict, 2005
12. Present
Scenario
1.
Introduction:
·
In the midst of security,
human rights, border Land and resource sharing issues of North East India, the illegal Immigration gets up in the
order as one of the major socio economic unresolved problems.
·
Started as a conflict between the inhabitants and
settlers as land tenants during British period, the issue developed as a
resource sharing to communal conflicts.
·
The clashes and loss of
life for the past five decades needs
strong political decisions regardless of the brotherhood bond between India and
Bangladesh.
·
The violence of Kokrajhar in Assam triggered all India communal
tensions towards a particular community.The issue needed to be addressed in a
broader platform.
·
For Mains, this article can be covered under topics of GS-II
paper and State PSCs exams.
2.
Strategic Importance:
·
Ethnic mosaic as diverse
as the rest of our nation, of the 563 communities listed by the “People of India” project, 635 were
categorized as tribal, as which 213 were belong to NE states.
·
Project also listed 325
languages of 175 belong to Tibeto-Burman and the MonKhmer family were found in
NE.
·
NE represents India’s most
complex affair, leading to difficulty in policy making and execution.
·
84% of its population from rural, Geography- 9%of India, 98% of
border form India’s International
Boundary.
·
Connected by 27Km ‘Siliguri Corridor’ of West Bengal with
rest of the Nation. Called as 7 sister and a brother State. Sikkim not part of
NE initially, till approved so by GoI in 2002.
·
Rich in Resources:
Hydrocarbons, coal, Limestone, dolomite, Graphite, Quartzite, Sillimonite etc.,
·
Over 10% of Forest
Products requirements of the country met from NER. Rich in Biodiversity,
Immense Potential in Hydro Power Generation.
·
80% of Total Hydro Power Potential of the Country.
Arunachal Pradesh alone Expected to Generate 267GW i.e 30% of Total Country
Production.
·
A central region for many
International Initiatives and Trade agreements: SAFTA, BIMSTEC, APTA, LEP, EAS.
·
Gateway for South-East Asian Nations. Though shares just 3% of Total GDP of the Nation.
·
Because of Multi-Lingual
and Multi-Religious society, NE envisaged with some special Provision in Our
Constitution like Part IX and Part IXA
not applicable for Nagaland and Parts of Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya,
Mizoram.
·
Local Autonomy ensured
with Sixth Schedule Status to NE states:
Assam, Tripura, Meghalaya and Mizoram.
·
Special Status For Nagaland Under Art- 371A
3.
Various Accords:
Peace Accords and the creation
and restructuring of Administrative Units in NE India
|
|||
Date
|
Accord
|
Parties to the Accord
|
Unit Created
|
1947
|
Naga-Akbar
Hydari Accord
|
Akbar
Hydari, Assam State and Naga National Council Representatives.
|
Nagas
Given Autonomy for 10years.
|
1960
|
Sixteen
Point Agreement
|
GoI
and Naga People’s Convention
|
Created
the State of Nagaland
|
1975
|
Shillong Accord
|
Governor
L.P.Singh of Nagaland and Underground Organization
|
Surrendered
but no benefit for Nagas
|
1985
|
Assam Accord
|
AASU&AGSP
reps, Union Home Ministry, Chief Secretary,Assam.
|
Explained
in detail Below
|
1986
|
MoU
|
GoI
and Laldenga on behalf of Mizo National Front
|
Created
the State of Mizoram
|
1988
|
MoU
|
GoI
and Tripura National Volunteers
|
Reorganization
of the Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous Dist Councils(TTAADC) promised
|
1988
|
Darjeeling Hill Accord
|
GoI,
WB State and Gorkhaland National Liberation Front
|
Darjeeling
Gorkha Hill Council
|
1993
|
Memorandum
of Settlement
|
All
Bodo Students Union President and Assam State
|
Bodoland
Autonomous Council
|
1993
|
Agartala Agreement/MoS
|
Tripura
state and All Tripura Tiger Force
|
Renewed
Commitment to reorganize TTAADC
|
1994
|
MoS
|
Mizoram
State Council and Hmar People’s Convention
|
Sinlung
Hills Development Council
|
1995
|
MoU
|
Assam
State and Representatives of community organization of the Rabhas, Karbis,
Tiwas and Mishings
|
Karbi
Anglong District council became Karbi Anglong autonomous Council.
Rabha-Hasong Autonomous council, Tiwa Autonomous council and Mishing
Autonomous Council which were not territorial, were established.
|
2003
|
Bodoland Territorial Council Agreement
|
GoI,
Assam State and Bodo territorial Council Agreement
|
Bodoland
Territorial Council
|
2011
|
MoU
|
GoI,
WB State and Gorkha Janmukti Morcha
|
Created Gorkhaland Territorial
Administration
|
4. The Sixth Schedule And Local Autonomy:
The
changing status of the areas under the
1919 and 1935 Acts after Independence is shown below.
Backward Tracts under 1919 Act Renamed as Excluded Areas in
1935
Act. Included in the Sixth Schedule
of the Indian
Constitution in 1950
|
Present Status of the
Areas
|
Garo
Hills district,
Khasi
Hills district
Jaintia
district
|
Reconstituted
as Meghalaya and an autonomous state
in Assam in 1969. Meghalaya, became a full fledged state in 1971. The three districts still enjoy autonomy
under the Sixth Schedule
|
Mikir
Hills
|
Renamed as Karbi Anglong
|
North
Cachar Hills
|
Renamed as North Cachar
|
Naga Hills district
|
Became
a part of Nagaland state in 1963(earlier constituted as union territory).
|
Lushai Hills district
|
Became
Mizoram state in 1987
(earlier constituted as union territory)
|
Sadiya frontier tract
Balipara frontier tract
Lakhimpur frontier tract
|
These
three tracts were first reconstituted as North-Eastern
Frontier Area (NEFA) and subsequently as Arunachal Pradesh state
|
·
Sixth Schedule
provided for autonomous districts and autonomous regions within those districts
with elected councils that enjoyed the power to levy certain taxes, to
constitute courts for administering justice and make laws on various subjects. Powers
of the District Councils and Regional Councils
to make laws were with respect to-
(a)
the allotment, occupation or use, or the setting apart, of land, other than any
land which is a reserved forest for the purposes of agriculture or grazing or
for residentialor other non-agricultural purposes or for any other purpose
likely to promote the interestsof the inhabitants of any village or town
(b)
the management of any forest not being a reserved forest;
(c)
the use of any canal or water-course for the purpose of agriculture;
(d)
the regulation of the practice of jhum or other forms of shifting cultivation;
(e)
the establishment of village or town committees or councils and their powers;
(f)
any other matter relating to village or town administration, including village
or town police and public health and sanitation;
(g)
the appointment or succession of Chiefs or Headmen;
(h)
the inheritance of property;
·
A "reserved
forest" mean area reserved under ‘Assam
ForestRegulation, 1891’, or under any other law for the time being in force
in the area inquestion.
·
The District Council for an autonomous district shall have the power to levy and collectall or any of the
following taxes within such district, that is to say-
(a)
taxes on professions, trades, callings and employments;
(b)
taxes on animals, vehicles and boats;
(c)
taxes on the entry of goods into a market for sale therein, and tolls on passengers
and goods carried in ferries; and
(d)
taxes for the maintenance of schools, dispensaries or roads. Further licences
or leases for the purpose of prospecting for, or extraction of, minerals. -Also
were under the purview of the respective District Council.
Areas in the NE region NOT covered under
part IX and part IX A of the constitution
State/Area within a State
|
Provisions under which exempt
|
Nagaland
|
Exempt under
Article 243M and not covered underSixth Schedule
|
Hill areas of Manipur
|
|
Meghalaya
|
Exempt under
Article 243M and covered by the provisions of the SixthSchedule
|
Mizoram
|
Exempt under
Article 243M, with some areas of the State covered by theprovisions of the
Sixth Schedule
|
Bodoland,
North Cachar and Karbi Anglong districts of Assam
|
Covered under
Sixth Schedule
|
5.
Historical
Background of the Issue:
·
British east India company brought Muslim Peasants from East Bengal to
Brahmaputra Valley(Policy of Permanent Settlement), Policy towards the
development of the region accelerated the movement of people from outside, they
needed essential human resources includes administrators, businessmen &
Laours.
·
Assam
annexed by British in 1826 and adopted Bengali as official
Language though mostly inhibited by Bodos and Ahoms. Bodos are Largest Plain Tribes of India.
·
Partition
Bengal in 1905 created Communal differences and
Tensions.
·
Formation
of All India Muslim League in Dhaka in 1906 encouraged the
migration to increase the Muslim population in Assam for political reasons.
·
GoI(Excluded
and Partially Excluded areas) order 1926 and GoI Act 1935
all based on assumptions that only hill
tribes need special protection as there were vast differences between them
and the majority of the Assamese people in the Plains.Plain Tribes Ignored.
·
In 1937 Muslim League,demanded and created Pakistan for Muslims,
became part of the ruling dispensation of Assam and its leader, Saiyid Mohammad
Saadulla, headed five different ministries for most of the period 1937-1946. The elections had been held to Indian
provinces after the British relented and gave Provincial Autonomy.
·
In 1941 the ruling Muslim League introduced Land Settlement Policy, which allowed migrants to settle down in government land
anywhere in Assam.
·
The agitation of locals
opposed to the migration was further intensified by claims of Saadulla during
World War II that his policy of allowing migrants into Assam was part of an effort
of the Muslim League to help the British in its World War II efforts. The Muslim League, which supported the
British war efforts, claimed immigrants would help in cultivating more food for
the war period.
6.
After
partition of India:
·
After partition, though Jinnah was secular in his inaugural
speech, the following government provoked major communal riots and made Hindus
to flee India.
·
The
East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act 1950
enacted by Muslim League made ‘No land
to be possessed by a single person in excess of 200 bighas or a quantity of 10
standard bighas/person of his family.
·
The Zamindars, mostly Hindus lost land
and fled to India in fear of future troubles.
·
India
Responded with Immigrant(Expulsion from Assam)Act 1950.
It distinguished immigrants as Hindus- refuees and Muslims- Migrants. Allowed
only people affected by civil disturbances in East Pakistan to settle in India(Muslim cannot claim so). Deported back
them into East Pakistan.
·
The India’s action created much antipathy
to Pakistan and the made a pact with India. That is Nehru-Liaquat Ali Agreement of 1950 to allow return of all migrants
back into East Pakistan regardless of religion and ensured same land they left
before flee.
·
Also
it brought Muslims who fled to East Pakistan back into India. Around 161360
people came to Assam through recognized route during 1950.
·
The
all deportation allowed only who migrated before Dec31, 1950.
7.
Immigration
Before and After 1971:
·
In 1964, Fresh Communal riots absorbed
in both nations. Large influx of Hindu migrants in India.
·
Assam
state passed ‘Prevention of Infiltration from Pakistan(PIP)Act 1964- More
Secular from 1950 Act.
·
This Formed Special Border Force, set up passport checkup center. More Engagements from federal government
for the governance of border area witnessed.
·
After the war of 1971, 75Million
population of Bangladesh, 10 Million fled to India as refugees and 1million
stayed permanently.
·
When Electoral rolls were revised byState Election Commission, found a
large no of Bangladeshi Muslims were included in that and asked the state to identify the constituencies with a big rise in no of
votes.
·
‘Assam
Movement’ (1979-85) formed to agitate against the issue,
Majority of them were Bodos, Koch-Rajbhangshi, Rabhas, Adivasis, Tea Tribes and
Assamese.
·
Issue worsened because of ‘Nalli Massacre-1983’.
·
As a result,GoI enacted Illegal Migrant(Detention by Tribunals)Act 1983
confined only to Assam.
·
Tripura do witnessed 6 lakh Bengali
immigrants from 1947-1971.
·
The Inhabitants who speaks Kokborok and
other tribal groups formed ‘Tripura
National Volunteer Force(TNVF) and killed Bengali Immigrants at Mandai
Bazaar(Mandai Bazaar Massacre).
·
Agreement between GoI & TNVF for
self-governance as ‘TripuraTribal
Autonomous Council’.
·
Extremists’ activities still exists
under ‘All Tripura Tiger Force’ and
‘National Liberation Front of Tripura’.
8.
Laws
and Agreements to tackle immigration and Citizenship in India:
·
The Foreigners Act 1946 (all India, except Assam till Assam Accord
was Signed).
·
The foreigners Order 1948
·
Citizenship Act 1955
·
The Foreigners (Tribunals) Order, 1964
·
The Foreigners (Tribunals) Amendment
Order 2012
·
The Passport(Entry into India)Act 1920
·
The Citizenship (Registration of Citizen
and Issue of National identity cards) Rules 2003
·
The Citizenship Rules 2009
·
Nehru- Liaquat Ali Agreement 1950
·
Assam Accord, 1985
9.
Provisions
of IMDT Act, 1983:
·
Enacted
purportedly to deal with the detention of foreigners illegally migrated
to India across the borders of the sensitive East& NE regions of the
Country.
·
Failed to serve the purpose because of
its very stringent provisions.
·
It setup tribunals to hear the
complaints as quasi-judicial body. The
complainant was required to prove the suspect is an Illegal Immigrant.
·
It
created burden to the complainant also contrary to other Laws, especially in
Foreigner Act the onus to prove lies on suspect not on the prosecution.
·
Also Complaint against a Immigrant could be
filled only by prosecution lives within 3Km radius of the residence of accused. The affidavit also
should be supported by a person of above same condition.
·
The
Act applicable to the migrants of after 25 March 1971.
·
The Definition
of ‘Illegal Immigrant’ was mentioned as one without possessing passport, any
travel document and any Law document.
·
Conviction become difficult because easy
to claim loss of passport, document etc., so responsibility again fell on
Litigant.
·
It
restricted Litigant by saying ‘not more than 10 application (or) declaration
per one litigant’.
10. Assam Accord, 1985
·
Fixed
the cut-off date to determine illegal migrants in Assam was March25,1971.
·
Migrants who arrived before that
considered citizens and arrived between Jan
01,1966 to Mar25, 1971 registered under Foreigners Act, their names deleted
from electoral rolls for 10 years and restored after that.
·
Those
who came after Mar25,1971 deported under IMDTs.
·
Other featuresof Accordinclude
(i)
Updating NRC of 1951
(ii)
Cross checking electoral rolls with the
updated NRC.
(iii)
Demarcation of the Indo-Bangladesh
border clearly and creation of clear inhibited belt.
(iv)
Strict maintenance of Birth &Death
registers at all administrative levels.
(v)
Raising additional armed battalions and
river police force to check infiltration
·
Rebels
not agreed with the accord and struggled to revoke it
and asked for new law which deports all illegal immigrants irrespective of time
of immigration.
11. Supreme Court Verdict,
2005
·
Failure
of IM(DT) Act, the cases Deported 1985-2003 were 1561
compared with deported from 1962-1984 through Foreigners Act 1946 were 3Lakh, questioned the validity of the Act.
·
On the Case Sarbananda Sonowalvs. Union of India in SC 2005,
held that onus to prove a person as a foreigner on the complainant as
unconstitutional and stuck down the Act.
·
SC
observed ‘Deep analysis of IMDT act & Rules made they have purportedly
enacted or made to give shelter or protection to immigrants of Bangladesh.
·
Also held the Tribunals under IMDT should ‘cease to function’ and cases
before it to be transferred to Foreigners
(Tribunals) order, 1964 and decided the manner provided under Foreigners Act, 1946.
·
After the verdict the central amended
Foreigners Act 1946 and Included Assam,
as like other states in the Act. The
tribunals became devoid of appellate authority to justify citizenship and the
power came under Executive Authority.
·
Government
of West Bengal Managed to deport 50lakh illegal migrants under Foreigners Act
without Tribunals, IMDT act and any agitations recently.
12. Present Scenario
·
According to a status Report of Union Home Ministry in 2008 says
(i)
The demographic Composition in the
districts bordering Bangladesh has altered with illegal immigration.
(ii)
Districts of Assam& WB bordering
Bangladesh recorded high growth of
population higher than the national Avg.
·
According to affidavit by Assam state in 2008 says
(i)
Three districts in Assam karimganj, Cachar and Dhubri borders
Bangladesh
(ii)
All India Decadal growth of population
during 1981-91 is 23.85%, but 42.08%, 47.5%, 56.57% respective with the above
Districts.
·
Consolidated
total Deported/Pushed back illegal Immigrants under IMDTs-1547(Till July 2005)
and Foreigners Tribunals-895(Till July 2012). Total=2442 Nos.
END
Name:
Marudavanan.S
References:
1.
White Paper onForeigners' Issue, Home &
Political Department,Government of
Assam, July 2012.
2.
Frontline
Magazine, August and September 2012 Editions.
3.
Research Paper on “MIGRATION AND REFUGEE ISSUE
BETWEEN INDIA AND BANGLADESH (2009)” by Chitran Kumar, South Asian Studies Division, School of
International Studies, JNU.
4. “Securitization Of Illegal Migration of
Bangladeshis To India” Josy Joseph, Institute
of Defence and Strategic Studies, Singapore.
No comments:
Post a Comment