The US-Iran
negotiations have successfully crossed the boulder that Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu threw in the way via his outreach to the American lawmakers.
The conclusion can be safely drawn after Netanyahu’s speech that neither
do the US lawmakers feel emboldened to enact new legislation intended
to complicate the US-Iran talks nor is President Barack Obama feeling
browbeaten to backtrack on his policy toward Iran.
Surprisingly, after
all the brouhaha in the recent weeks, Netanyahu failed to rally the political
class in Washington behind his thesis that a deal with Iran is only going to
punctuate Tehran’s inexorable march toward clandestinely developing nuclear
weapons. On the other hand, his theatrical address before the US Congress has
raised such political dust and has proved to be so divisive an intervention in
American politics—and added, equally, to the reality that the majority public
opinion in the US favours an Iran deal—that a question mark can be out on the
sheer efficacy of the Senate even passing a bill requiring Obama to
submit any agreement with Iran for congressional
approval.
All that the
Republican-dominated Congress may end up having will be the reserve power (which
it already wields) to delay by an year or two the permanent lifting of
sanctions against Iran if a deal is reached which, of course, can also be
circumvented through executive action by the President to
waive the sanctions
temporarily.
To be sure, there was
a discernible swagger in Secretary of State John Kerry’s remarks to the media
following his latest round of talks with his Iranian counterpart Mohammad
Zarif in Montreux, Switzerland. Kerry claimed “some progress” at the
latest round but added the caveat that “there are still significant gaps and
important choices to be made”. He seemed to hint at an “increased breakout
time” as something that the US is seeking but is yet unsure of it finding
acceptability in Tehran. Simply put, we will
have to wait till March 15 to find out when the next round of talks is slated to
take place. In this case, however, the Ides of March do not necessarily evoke the
notoriously dark mood in William Shakespeare’s time, but instead from
Kerry’s tone would seem to hark back to the late antiquity signifying the
celebratory day it used to be for Romans marking the\ ceremonies of the new
year and the expulsion of the old year.
Indeed, the fact that
Kerry left for Riyadh to take the Saudi leadership into confidence and to
brief his GCC counterparts (who are assembling in Riyadh to hear him out) as well
as his travel plan thereafter to proceed to Europe to confabulate with his
British, French and German counterparts in the weekend
would suggest that
while it is “certainly possible” (as Kerry put it) that the talks may not ultimately
yield any deal on time, the odds are possibly moving in favour of a deal
being reached.
Ambassador
M.K. Bhadrakumar was a career diplomat in the Indian Foreign
Service.
His assignments included the Soviet Union, South Korea, Sri Lanka,
Germany, Afghanistan,
Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Kuwait and Turkey. www.mainstreamweekly.net
No comments:
Post a Comment